Skip to content
Economicium Free tools for markets and money.

Prop Firm Profit Target Calculator

What are your real odds of passing an evaluation? This simulator runs your strategy through 2,000 simulated challenges, each a race to the profit target before the drawdown floor, and reports the pass rate, the breach rate, and how many attempts a pass should realistically take.

By , founder and editor Updated

Firm-agnostic: enter the target and drawdown from your own agreement (static floor assumed; trailing rules are harsher). Always verify the exact rules with your firm.

Pass rate
Failed by breach
Median trades to pass
Expected attempts

How the simulation works

win: equity × (1 + risk × RR)  ·  loss: equity × (1 − risk)
pass: equity ≥ 1 + target  ·  breach: equity ≤ 1 − maxDD

The 2,000 simulations are traded through each of their respective runs. The size for each trade is determined by a fixed fraction (i.e., you have said how much to put into each trade). Every trade is won as per your specified win rate; if so, it also pays according to your stated reward-to-risk. After a run, it will end immediately upon reaching its profit goal (or pass), upon touching the bottom of the drawdown (and thus the run is terminated), or after all of the allowed trades are used and neither profit nor loss has been reached (as would be the case in an actual challenge where there were no limits on trading time — i.e., still grinding).

A worked example

The default inputs describe a solid retail strategy: 50% win rate at 1.5R, an expectancy of +0.25R per trade, risking 1% into an 8% target with a 10% static drawdown. That trader passes roughly 97% of attempts, and still, about 1 in 35 runs dies on an early losing streak despite a positive edge and sensible sizing. Now load the harsher example preset, a 10% target over a 5% drawdown, the target twice the distance of the floor. The same trader's pass rate drops to roughly 84%, and here is the trap: chasing the further target by raising risk makes it worse, not better. At 2% risk the pass rate falls to about 66%, at 3% to about 58%, because the nearby floor punishes big bets far faster than the distant target rewards them. Nothing about the trader changed; the geometry did, and evaluations are priced and marketed on exactly that geometry.

Which firm, and how long it takes

The simulator can be used with any brokerage. Input your firm's target and drawdown requirements for the evaluation (FTMO, Apex, TopStep, MyFundedFutures, Funding Pips etc.) as well as whether it is one-step or two-step, futures or forex. One-step evaluations generally have a target ranging from 6% to 10% with a corresponding drawdown of 5% to 10%. However, the specific values, including if the floor trails, will be defined by your firm. Thus, use the specifics contained within your firm's rulebook rather than relying on general rules of thumb. A "median-trades-to-pass" value will provide an answer to the "how long?" question directly. To convert this to a total number of days you would trade before passing a test, simply multiply the result by the average number of trades taken per trading session. Finally, keep in mind that the slowest quarter of runs in any simulation will typically take much longer than the median run.

Reading the numbers like a business decision

Multiply expected attempts by the evaluation fee and you have the real cost of getting funded with your strategy, before any payout. That number belongs next to the profit split calculator's breakeven figure: together they answer "what will funding cost me, and how much gross profit must I then produce before I am net positive?" If the honest answer is unattractive, better to learn it from a simulation than from a sequence of fees. The drawdown calculator covers the survival arithmetic once you are funded, and the risk-of-ruin simulator runs the same engine without the evaluation's barriers for your own account.

One honest caveat to the input parameters for this method is that nearly all active traders are going to over-estimate their actual win percentage (the percent of time you actually "win" in trading) and under estimate the spread of how much money they can expect to make when they do win (reward), compared to the amount of money they could lose if they don't (risk). As such, we recommend that if your data comes from less than a couple hundred real-time trades, that you run the simulation again, but this time use a win percentage that is at least 5% less than your current number and then take the difference between those two values as your uncertainty. Then, act on any pass probability that survives that cut. Fail to act on any pass probabilities that fail that test.

Frequently asked questions

Why is my pass rate so low even with a profitable strategy?
Because an evaluation is not asking whether you are profitable, it is asking whether you reach +X% before you ever touch -Y%, a race between two barriers where the loss barrier is usually closer. A trader with a genuine edge and modest risk can easily have a sub-50% chance on any single attempt. That is not a flaw in your trading; it is the structure of the product. The realistic question is expected attempts to pass, which the calculator also shows.
Should I raise my risk per trade to pass faster?
Raising risk raises both the pass probability per unit of time and the breach probability, and the breach usually grows faster. Try it in the calculator: move risk from 1% to 3% and watch the failed-by-breach share. A common finding is a risk level beyond which pass probability actually falls, because runs die before the target. Where that peak sits depends on your win rate and reward-to-risk; there is no universal answer, which is exactly why you should simulate your own numbers.
Why does the simulation ignore the daily loss limit?
The number of trades allowed in one day limits both your trading volume (trades-per-day) and also the time (intraday sequencing), the above is a trade-by-trade simulation. The model can include an honest representation of such a limitation by making assumptions about how many trades you will make each day. In order to create a model without such limitations, the simulated winning percentages may be overly optimistic. If you regularly enter multiple trades daily with significant potential loss, consider your true probabilities to be less favorable then those reported here.
What does "expected attempts" assume?
Independent, identically distributed attempts: expected attempts = 1 ÷ pass probability. Real attempts are not fully independent (you learn, you tilt, firms change rules), but it is the honest first-order estimate of what an evaluation will really cost you in fees before you hold a funded account.
Is this a target-profit (break-even) accounting calculator?
No. This estimates the odds of passing a proprietary-trading-firm evaluation: a race to a profit target before a drawdown floor. It is not the managerial-accounting target-profit calculation (fixed costs plus desired profit, divided by contribution margin) used to work out the sales a business needs. If you are doing cost-volume-profit analysis, this is the wrong tool.

Method and limitations

Monte Carlo on your inputs only: 2,000 independent runs, constant win probability and payoff, fixed-fractional sizing, static drawdown floor, no fees, slippage, daily loss limits, correlation or time limits. Real evaluations add constraints that only make the odds worse, so read the pass rate as an upper bound. Results resample on every run. Economicium is not affiliated with any proprietary trading firm; verify every rule with yours.

This tool runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is sent to us or stored.

For general information and education only. This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. This tool is provided as is, with no warranty of accuracy: like any software it can contain errors, so always verify figures against your broker or the original source before acting on them. Trading and investing carry risk, including the risk of losing more than your initial outlay.

Spotted an error? Email contact@economicium.com and it will be corrected. Maintained by Joey van Diest.